Disinfection plays a critical role in the poultry processing industry. A range of disinfectants are utilised to maintain plant biosafety and to manufacture a pathogen-free, safe-to-consume product. From traditional chemicals, such as chlorine to newer, more widely accepted ones such as peracetic acid (PAA), disinfectants are a vital component of any poultry facility.
For more information about the role of disinfection in poultry processing view our article What Role Does Disinfection Play In Poultry Processing In The US?
An area of focus has been the application of disinfectants in the right quantities. Overdosing can lead to wasting expensive chemicals and can even alter the appearance of the final product. On the other hand, underdosing can cause inadequate disinfection which can result in reduced food safety and a decrease in USDA SalmCat ratings. Unsafe food can cause costly recalls which can have a significant effect on the producer’s reputation.
As a result, disinfection use in a poultry processing plant is a closely monitored activity. Regular testing of wash water samples taken from different steps of the processing chain is essential to enable timely corrective action.
Irrespective of the disinfectant used, there are two basic ways in which dosing is measured – Offline and Inline (or Online). Offline methods involve collecting a sample and measuring the chemical concentrations either in a lab or by using a field test kit.
Alternatively, inline measurement involve in-situ test probes that continuously measure disinfectant levels and provide real-time feedback enabling dosing to be adjusted.
The technologically advanced inline monitoring systems are more desirable as they cause the least disruption to the processing operation and enable sophisticated plant automation. Sensors for pH, temperature, turbidity, chlorine, etc. are widely used in the food and beverage industry for monitoring disinfectant levels and wash water properties.
However, the poultry industry poses several unique challenges for inline monitoring systems.
Given the limitations involved, including the need for frequent calibration of a large number of probes, makes using inline monitoring systems impractical for poultry processing.
When it comes to the poultry industry, offline monitoring techniques are the most feasible, least effort intensive methods. There are several methods to conduct tests offline and in the example of monitoring peracetic acid, the best methods are HPLC or two-stage titration.
High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) is a laboratory-based test method that involves running a test sample through a chromatography column under highly controlled conditions. The column physically separates all of the chemicals in the sample so that we can isolate and measure just the peracetic acid component. When performed by a trained operator, it is a highly accurate process, which is not impacted by other interfering chemicals or disinfectant by-products.
Although treated as the gold standard in test methodologies, HPLC has several drawbacks. It is an expensive and complex process that requires employing highly skilled personnel. Also, it is a slow process. From collecting the sample to running the test and obtaining the results, it can take anywhere between several hours to days depending on whether the test is conducted on-site or is sent to a third-party laboratory, which is clearly not practical for onsite dosing control.
The second laboratory based test for PAA is a double (two-stage) titration that in the first step removes hydrogen peroxide from the sample before analysing the PAA in the second step. Hydrogen peroxide interferes in all PAA titrations that utilise potassium iodide so removing it from the sample is necessary for an accurate result.
There are two main chemistries that can be used to remove the hydrogen peroxide: potassium permanganate or cerium with ferroin. A two-stage titration can require careful sample temperature control and skilled analysts, as over titration of the first stage can cause significant issues with the PAA measurement in the second stage.
Due to the limitations with HPLC and two-stage titration, poultry plants rely on quick field test methods to test the levels of disinfectants.
Visual colorimetric tests are the easiest and simplest way of estimating the level of disinfectant in wash water and chillers. The simple test method does not require the operator to complete extended or in-depth training prior to carrying out the test, and a result can be produced in minutes.
The two most commonly used colorimetric tests used in the food and beverage industry are the DPD (N,N-diethyl-p-phenylenediamine) method with a comparator and the test strips method.
In the DPD method, a buffer and indicator are added to a test sample and the colour change is observed. The colour is then compared to a range of standard colours pre-established on the basis of the concentration of the test chemical.
Similarly, with the test strips method, a pre-fabricated test strip is dipped in a test sample. The change in the strip colour is an indicator of the concentration of the test chemical.
Although visual colorimetric test methods offer low-cost testing on-site they have several drawbacks:
The limitations of visual testing can be overcome by using photometers or reflectometers. Photometry relies on light transmission to detect colour changes in a sample and reflectometers detect colour change on the surface of a test strip. Both test methods then display the reading on a screen.
Despite these advantages, photometric and reflectometric readings are prone to interference from other chemicals and oxidizers, extreme sample pH and the time it takes to get the sample into the device. Additionally, as photometers rely on light transmission anything that alters the passage of light through the sample can reduce the accuracy of the results. This means photometers are not suitable for highly coloured or turbid samples – even a scratch on the test tube can alter the results.
Drop count tests are mini, simplified titration kits that require several reagents to be added to the sample in a step by step process. Reagents need to be added slowly and in a specific order, using a dropper to ensure accurate readings.
Like with laboratory titrations, the drop count tests still require a skilled operator to carry out the titration for the most accurate results. The kits are susceptible to manual errors, such as using the wrong titrant, or inadequate swirling. Mistakes can also be made during the calculation process.
When monitoring PAA, drop count kits do not effectively handle interference from hydrogen peroxide. Some kits make no attempt to correct for hydrogen peroxide at all, while other kits intentionally catalyse the reaction with hydrogen peroxide. Kits that attempt to include the hydrogen peroxide reaction incorrectly assume that in ‘real’ contaminated samples the ratio of PAA to hydrogen peroxide is the same as in the bulk chemical, adding additional error.
Finally, and potentially the biggest limitation for the poultry industry, drop count kits for PAA commonly come in two variants:
The high ppm-per-drop calibration of the high range kits makes them unsuitable for dosing control, meaning many plants rely on the low or regular range drop count kits even for samples that are above 600 ppm. Without dilution, these kits will significantly under-report the concentration of PAA due to insufficient addition of reaction chemicals like buffers and potassium iodide. In these circumstances results, will often ‘plateau’ even with increasing PAA concentration. This can cause costly overdosing to go undetected for long periods of time.
To find out why our Kemio technology performs better than drop count in poultry processing read our article.
Kemio™ is a best-in-class chemical monitoring device that is suitable for the unique requirements of the poultry processing industry. It is based on offline chrono-amperometric technology that is highly accurate and ideal for field-use. Kemio™ eliminates the complexity and training challenges encountered with drop count kits while achieving laboratory grade accuracy, driven by the fundamentals of single-use chemical sensors.
Kemio™ technology has several advantages over the existing test technologies:
Multiparameter testing platform
Kemio™ performs tests for bromine, chlorine (free and total), chlorine dioxide, chlorite and peracetic acid (PAA) on one instrument with the use of different sensors. To view our full list of Kemio sensors click here.
Kemio enables rapid testing (within 60 seconds) at the point of use even with high concentration samples, greatly reducing time and labour.
Suitable for all users
With on-screen visual instructions, Kemio™ can be used by anyone straight out of the box.
Fully traceable data
Results do not require subjective interpretation. Up to 10,000 results can be stored on the instrument eliminating the need for maintaining paper records. Results are also tagged with the batch number, date, time operator and sample ID’s.
Suitable for all sample types
Kemio is not affected by colour, turbidity, pH, hydrogen peroxide concentration or the organic load of the sample.
Safer for the operator
Kemio does not require the use of harsh chemicals or unsafe glassware for conducting tests.
Maintenance and calibration free
Kemio uses single-use, disposable amperometric sensors. Each sensor is used only once so there is no potential for fouling or calibration drift.
It has been independently verified that our sensors provide similar levels of accuracy in detecting PAA levels as those detected by HPLC in waters with high organic contamination (as measured by TOC). The tests were repeated for a wide range of disinfectant concentrations and further substantiated the Kemio™’s precision. Find out more about the study here.
Summary graph of results from CEBAS-CISC PAA study. Study shows results obtained using the Kemio PAA Sensor method were similar to laboratory HPLC methods irrespective of the level of organic contamination up to 1000 mg/L TOC.
Internal comparisons to regular range drop count kits show how Kemio continues to respond accurately even with high concentration samples, preventing costly overdosing from going undetected.
Left graph: Summary graph of internal study showing a regular range drop count kit response plateauing when sample concentration exceeds 600 ppm whereas Kemio maintains accuracy.
10th July 2023
Arsenic contamination in groundwater can pose serious health risks if consumed over a prolonged period. In this article, we will explore the sources of arsenic contamination, the health impacts, and the methods for determining the concentration of arsenic in water.
12th April 2023
Harmful levels of arsenic in drinking water can now be detected more rapidly and easily, thanks to our brand new Kemio arsenic sensors.
23rd February 2023
Lead exposure, through the contamination of drinking water, can have major health implications. It is vital that municipal authorities can employ accurate testing methods to identify sources of lead contamination. Multiple techniques including Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP/MS) and Anodic Stripping Voltammetry (ASV) can be used to detect lead in water – in this article we review these methods in more detail.